тест на зимни гуми 235/55 R20 за 2026
Резултати от тестовете
обща производителностна класация
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00578%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P75%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 373%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 669%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V90654%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro49%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP41%
сух
тегло в общото оценяване:
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P78%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00577%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 371%
4.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro70%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V90667%
6.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP64%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 664%
сухо спиране
50%
1.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
2.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
69%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
71%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%
5.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
53%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
58%
обработка в сухо състояние
50%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
85%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
5.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
70%
6.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
65%
7.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
мокър
тегло в общото оценяване:
40%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00587%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 376%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 670%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P70%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V90658%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro49%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP29%
спиране на мокра настилка
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
55%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
50%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%
мокра обработка
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
70%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
60%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
64%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
65%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
47%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
43%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
24%
аквапланинг - кръст
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
77%
3.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
4.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
62%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
62%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
32%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
22%
Завиване в мокър кръг
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
4.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
66%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
65%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
не е достатъчно данни
сняг
тегло в общото оценяване:
30%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 673%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 368%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P68%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00566%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V90644%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro31%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP29%
сцепление със снега
33%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
41%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
37%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
27%
спиране при сняг
33%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
45%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
35%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
29%
обработка на снега
33%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
63%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
59%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
45%
6.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
31%
7.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
21%
завои в сняг
0%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
3.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
62%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
36%
6.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
34%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
не е достатъчно данни
комфорт
тегло в общото оценяване:
5%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 374%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P73%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro65%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00561%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 640%
външен шум
100%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
3.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
65%
4.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
66%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
65%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
61%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
40%
вътрешен шум
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
68%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
63%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
57%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
не е достатъчно данни
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
не е достатъчно данни
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
не е достатъчно данни
комфорт
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
70%
4.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
5.
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
65%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
52%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
не е достатъчно данни