сравнение: Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof срещу. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

5. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

4. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

5. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 силно препоръчително

4. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 все още се препоръчва

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

Vredestein
ULTRAC

85%

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

78%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 94%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 93%

3. Nokian Powerproof 86%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 65%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 96%

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 89%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 87%

4. Nokian Powerproof 69%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

3. Nokian Powerproof 79%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 77%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 77%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 64%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Nokian Powerproof A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Vredestein
ULTRAC

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

69%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 71%

4. Nokian Powerproof 57%

5. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 57%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 81%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

5. Nokian Powerproof 0%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 ?

2. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Nokian Powerproof ?

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

62%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

52%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

2. Nokian Powerproof 59%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 57%

5. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 51%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 78%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 57%

4. Nokian Powerproof 38%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 29%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 C

3. Nokian Powerproof C

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

84%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

78%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

75%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

1. Nokian Powerproof 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

5. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 85%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 73%

5. Nokian Powerproof 59%