сравнение: Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof срещу. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

4. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 силно препоръчително

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 все още се препоръчва

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

78%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 94%

2. Nokian Powerproof 86%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 65%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 89%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

3. Nokian Powerproof 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 82%

2. Nokian Powerproof 79%

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 77%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 64%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Nokian Powerproof A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

69%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 65%

3. Nokian Powerproof 57%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 57%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 81%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 78%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

4. Nokian Powerproof 0%

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Nokian Powerproof ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

62%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

2. Nokian Powerproof 59%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 51%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 64%

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 57%

4. Nokian Powerproof 38%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 C

3. Nokian Powerproof C

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2

75%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

1. Nokian Powerproof 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 73%

4. Nokian Powerproof 59%