сравнение: Yokohama W.drive V905 срещу. Barum Polaris 5 срещу. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 срещу. Falken EuroWinter HS01

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 висш среден клас

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 висш среден клас

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 висш среден клас

4. Barum Polaris 5 евтин

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

3. Barum Polaris 5 26.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Barum Polaris 5 2023

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 много добър

2. Barum Polaris 5 добър

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 задоволителен

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 задоволителен

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 добър

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 условно препоръчано

3. Barum Polaris 5 достатъчно

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 достатъчно

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 63%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 64%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

3. Barum Polaris 5 66%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 65%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 56%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 78%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

89%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 51%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Barum
Polaris 5

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Barum Polaris 5 72%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

2. Barum Polaris 5 E

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Barum Polaris 5 74%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 77%

1. Barum Polaris 5 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%