сравнение: Torque TQ022 срещу. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 срещу. Yokohama W.drive V905 срещу. Uniroyal MS plus 77 срещу. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 висш среден клас

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 висш среден клас

4. Torque TQ022 евтин

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow евтин

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

5. Torque TQ022 1

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

5. Torque TQ022 3x

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

5. Torque TQ022 22.

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

5. Torque TQ022 35.

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

5. Torque TQ022 28.67

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

5. Torque TQ022 2017

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 добър

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 задоволителен

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 задоволителен

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow задоволителен

5. Torque TQ022 ?

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 добър

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 задоволителен

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow задоволителен

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 условно препоръчано

5. Torque TQ022 ?