сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

3. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Nokian Powerproof 53

4. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Nokian Powerproof 11x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Nokian Powerproof 2022

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

4. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

3. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

4. Nexen CP672 A ?