сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

3. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

4. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

5. Nexen CP672 A ?