сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 силно препоръчително

4. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 все още се препоръчва

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

5. Nexen CP672 A ?