сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

3. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

5. Nexen CP672 A ?