сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Nexen CP672 A ?