сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 силно препоръчително

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 все още се препоръчва

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

5. Nexen CP672 A ?