сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof срещу. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 силно препоръчително

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 все още се препоръчва

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Nexen CP672 A ?