сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Bridgestone Turanza T005 срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

5. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

6. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nokian Powerproof 2022

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof примерен

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 добър

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

6. Nexen CP672 A ?