сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Bridgestone Turanza T005 срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

6. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nokian Powerproof 2022

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 примерен

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 добър

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

5. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

6. Nexen CP672 A ?