сравнение: Nexen CP672 A срещу. Bridgestone Turanza T005 срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 примерен

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Nexen CP672 A ?