сравнение: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 висш среден клас

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

4. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 силно препоръчително

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 условно препоръчано

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

68%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

3. Nokian Powerproof 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

1. Nokian Powerproof 86%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 86%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 71%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 53%

1. Nokian Powerproof 79%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 65%

1. Nokian Powerproof A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

2. Nokian Powerproof 90%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 80%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 60%

4. Nokian Powerproof 59%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

87%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 87%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

4. Nokian Powerproof 57%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Nokian Powerproof ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 68%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

4. Nokian Powerproof 38%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

3. Nokian Powerproof 59%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Nokian Powerproof C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?