сравнение: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 висш среден клас

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

3. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 силно препоръчително

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 условно препоръчано

5. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

Vredestein
ULTRAC

89%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

68%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 91%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 63%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 91%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 68%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 88%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 86%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 71%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 90%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 53%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 65%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

88%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

82%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 89%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 80%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 60%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

87%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

70%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

70%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 87%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 74%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 74%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 65%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

55%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 68%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 35%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 84%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 59%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?