сравнение: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

4. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

68%

1. Nokian Powerproof 86%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 75%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 69%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

2. Nokian Powerproof 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 60%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 55%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 77%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. Nokian Powerproof 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Nokian Powerproof A

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

75%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

67%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

4. Nokian Powerproof 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

4. Nokian Powerproof 0%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

3. Nokian Powerproof ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Nokian
Powerproof

89.6%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72.3%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

0%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

3. Nokian Powerproof 59%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 64%

4. Nokian Powerproof 38%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

3. Nokian Powerproof C

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

84%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

1. Nokian Powerproof 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 86%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 86%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Nokian Powerproof 59%