сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 победител в теста

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 примерен

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 добър

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 препоръчан

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 70%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 68%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 58%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 58%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 61%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

Continental
PremiumContact 7

94%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

86%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

80%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 90%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 81%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

70%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

69%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 65%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 63%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

Continental
PremiumContact 7

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

68%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

64%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 72%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 71%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB