сравнение: Bridgestone Turanza T005 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Vredestein ULTRAC срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun срещу. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 висш среден клас

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun висш среден клас

5. Nokian Powerproof висш среден клас

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

5. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

5. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun примерен

2. Nokian Powerproof примерен

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 примерен

4. Vredestein ULTRAC силно препоръчително

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 добър

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добър

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все още се препоръчва

4. Nokian Powerproof условно препоръчано

5. Vredestein ULTRAC достатъчно

Vredestein
ULTRAC

90%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

87%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

83%

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 94%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 76%

4. Nokian Powerproof 69%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 91%

2. Nokian Powerproof 86%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 85%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 81%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 93%

2. Nokian Powerproof 88%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 87%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 75%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 93%

3. Nokian Powerproof 88%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 71%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 98%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

5. Nokian Powerproof 79%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Nokian Powerproof A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

89%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

84%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

83%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 91%

2. Nokian Powerproof 90%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 90%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 85%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 84%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 84%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 77%

5. Nokian Powerproof 59%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

81%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

77%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 78%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 77%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

5. Nokian Powerproof 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

3. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

4. Nokian Powerproof ?

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Nokian
Powerproof

89.6%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

81.9%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

76.3%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72.3%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

0%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

65%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

55%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

3. Nokian Powerproof 59%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 56%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 42%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 69%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 65%

4. Nokian Powerproof 38%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 38%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Nokian Powerproof C

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?