сравнение: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 срещу. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P срещу. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ срещу. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ висш среден клас

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 висш среден клас

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 много добър

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P победител в теста

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 добър

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добър

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 добър

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добър

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 добър

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P добър

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%