тест на летни гуми 255/65 R16 за 2026
Резултати от тестовете
обща производителностна класация
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00571%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 656%
3.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport51%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
General Tire Grabber GT Plus50%
5.
Viking ProTech NewGen
Viking ProTech NewGen50%
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM46%
сух
тегло в общото оценяване:
35%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00578%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport66%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 650%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
General Tire Grabber GT Plus35%
5.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM30%
сухо спиране
50%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
53%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
4.
Viking ProTech NewGen
43%
5.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
43%
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
29%
обработка в сухо състояние
50%
1.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
79%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
72%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
27%
5.
Viking ProTech NewGen
не е достатъчно данни
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
не е достатъчно данни
поведение при шофиране на сухо
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
63%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
не е достатъчно данни
5.
Viking ProTech NewGen
не е достатъчно данни
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
не е достатъчно данни
мокър
тегло в общото оценяване:
50%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00572%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport47%
3.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
General Tire Grabber GT Plus46%
4.
Viking ProTech NewGen
Viking ProTech NewGen43%
5.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 635%
спиране на мокра настилка
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
72%
2.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
3.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
50%
4.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
48%
5.
Continental EcoContact 6
43%
6.
Viking ProTech NewGen
36%
мокра обработка
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
56%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
39%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
36%
5.
Viking ProTech NewGen
не е достатъчно данни
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
не е достатъчно данни
аквапланинг - надлъжен
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
2.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
52%
3.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
51%
4.
Viking ProTech NewGen
39%
5.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
33%
6.
Continental EcoContact 6
27%
аквапланинг - кръст
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
65%
2.
Viking ProTech NewGen
66%
3.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
46%
5.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
27%
6.
Continental EcoContact 6
19%
Завиване в мокър кръг
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
2.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
69%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
45%
4.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
36%
5.
Viking ProTech NewGen
не е достатъчно данни
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
не е достатъчно данни
комфорт
тегло в общото оценяване:
5%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 679%
2.
Viking ProTech NewGen
Viking ProTech NewGen67%
3.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
General Tire Grabber GT Plus53%
4.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport47%
5.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00532%
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM30%
външен шум
100%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
79%
2.
Viking ProTech NewGen
67%
3.
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
4.
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
47%
5.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
32%
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
30%