3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Брой тестове
5
10
1
4
28
Best position
#9
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
6.0
1.0
3.3
2.3
най-нов тест
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
налични размери
24
109
66
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
цена/стойност
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store