3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Брой тестове
5
1
6
4
28
Best position
#9
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
1.0
4.7
3.3
2.3
най-нов тест
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
налични размери
24
66
146
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
цена/стойност
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store