3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Goodride Solmax 1 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodride
Solmax 1
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Брой тестове
5
2
3
4
1
28
Best position
#9
#8
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
9.5
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.3
най-нов тест
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
налични размери
24
46
36
40
66
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodride Solmax 1
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodride Solmax 1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodride Solmax 1
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodride Solmax 1
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodride Solmax 1
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodride Solmax 1
57%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
цена/стойност
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodride Solmax 1
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store