3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
5
6
3
4
28
1
Best position
#9
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
2.3
1.0
най-нов тест
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
налични размери
24
146
36
40
67
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
цена/стойност
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store