3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Брой тестове
4
4
28
3
6
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
2.3
3.7
4.7
2.8
най-нов тест
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
налични размери
40
111
67
36
146
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
спиране на мокра настилка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
мокра обработка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
аквапланинг - кръст
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Завиване в мокър кръг
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
сух
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
сухо спиране
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
обработка в сухо състояние
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
реакция на сухо управление
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
външен шум
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
разходи
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
съпротивление при търкаляне
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
пробег
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store