3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Брой тестове
4
28
4
6
3
5
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
2.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
2.8
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
налични размери
40
67
111
146
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
спиране на мокра настилка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
мокра обработка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
аквапланинг - кръст
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Завиване в мокър кръг
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
сух
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
сухо спиране
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
обработка в сухо състояние
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
реакция на сухо управление
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
външен шум
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
разходи
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
съпротивление при търкаляне
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
пробег
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store