сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

висш среден клас

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

21

5

28

4

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

2.8

2.3

3.3

най-нов тест

2024

2026

налични размери

165

139

67

40

мокър

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

аквапланинг - кръст

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

мокра обработка

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

спиране на мокра настилка

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

сух

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

сухо спиране

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

външен шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

вътрешен шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

разходи

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

пробег

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

цена/стойност

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

гуми за автомобили с двигатели за ел. двигатели Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението