3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 срещу. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Брой тестове
6
4
24
29
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
3.3
2.7
3.7
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
146
40
302
180

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
представяне на мокро
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
сух
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
представяне на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
разходи
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store