3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Vredestein Wintrac срещу. Vredestein Wintrac Pro (2026)

Blizzak dominates wet tarmac; WinterContact TS 860 takes over when snow arrives.

Both Continental and Bridgestone bring premium pedigree to this pairing, and both tyres have accumulated an unusually large body of independent test data. Their characters, however, diverge clearly: the WinterContact TS 860 is a balanced all-conditions winter tyre with exceptional snow credentials, while the Blizzak LM-005 is an unapologetic wet specialist — arguably the finest cold wet-tarmac performer of its generation. Both have since been updated (the TS 870 and Blizzak 6 are their respective successors), but both originals remain widely fitted and thoroughly understood.

Test profile

Vredestein
Wintrac
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Брой тестове
11
37
Best position
#3
#1
Average position
8.4
6.4
най-нов тест
2024
2024
налични размери
43
131

These tyres were not tested together. the comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 36 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

сух
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
92%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94%
сухо спиране
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
99%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
Vredestein Wintrac
85%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
97%
безопасност
Vredestein Wintrac
89%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
97%
обработка в сухо състояние
Vredestein Wintrac
98%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
96%
обработка в сухо състояние - цел
Vredestein Wintrac
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
Vredestein Wintrac
87%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
98%
реакция на сухо управление
Vredestein Wintrac
97%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86%
комфорт на сухо
Vredestein Wintrac
97%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
83%

Dry performance is close. In the one mutual test where dry braking was precisely measured, both tyres recorded identical stopping distances of 15.4m. Across a broader range of evaluations, the TS 860 scores marginally higher overall, but the Blizzak has earned genuine praise for precise, neutral dry handling — its objective dry handling scores rank among the highest in its test group. The Blizzak's consistent weakness on dry roads is braking: testers across multiple years flag extended dry stops as its most notable deficit relative to class leaders, while the TS 860 is more composed here. Neither challenges the very best dry-focused winter tyres, but the Continental is the safer choice on dry tarmac.

мокър
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
95%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
92%
аквапланинг - кръст
Vredestein Wintrac
91%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94%
спиране на мокра настилка
Vredestein Wintrac
97%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
мокра обработка
Vredestein Wintrac
98%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
98%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Vredestein Wintrac
94%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
93%
мокра обработка - цел
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
100%
Мокра безопасност
Vredestein Wintrac
92%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
69%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Vredestein Wintrac
96%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
98%

This is where the Blizzak LM-005 defines itself. Averaged across two shared wet braking measurements, it stops in 22.8m versus the TS 860's 24.0m — a 1.2m gap that holds consistently across different sizes. In the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 head-to-head, the difference widened to 2.3m (29.2m vs 31.5m), with the Blizzak finishing first in a 53-tyre field. Bridgestone achieved the maximum score in 80-0 km/h wet stopping in ADAC testing, and multiple organisations have since ranked it best-in-class for wet braking. The TS 860 is far from weak — its wet handling and wet circle cornering scores are class-leading — but the Blizzak's wet braking score of 94.6 represents a genuine step beyond. On aquaplaning resistance, the TS 860 edges ahead (87.6 vs 84.9).

сняг
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
90%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
91%
спиране при сняг
Vredestein Wintrac
90%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94%
обработка на снега
Vredestein Wintrac
89%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
91%
сцепление със снега
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
обработка на снега - цел
Vredestein Wintrac
83%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
90%
странични указания за сняг
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
84%
завои в сняг
Vredestein Wintrac
91%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
92%

Snow is the TS 860's strongest suit and the Blizzak's most significant limitation. The gap between their snow performance scores (90.5 vs 77.6) is the largest single difference in this comparison and is backed by consistent test evidence: the TS 860's snow circle cornering and measured snow handling are class-level, praised across multiple test campaigns. The Blizzak, by contrast, repeatedly draws criticism for understeer and weak lateral grip on snow, with ADAC explicitly flagging it as below par on winter roads. In the Autobild 2019 head-to-head, snow braking was nearly identical (24.5m vs 24.6m), but handling and traction on packed snow tell the real story. For drivers who regularly face snow-covered roads, this difference should be treated as decisive.

лед
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
96%
спиране на лед
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
98%
странично насочване на леда
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94%
спиране на лед
Vredestein Wintrac
97%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
комфорт
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
94%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
външен шум
Vredestein Wintrac
96%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
93%
комфорт
Vredestein Wintrac
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
вътрешен шум
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
97%

Rolling resistance favours the Blizzak (86.6 vs 81.7), giving it a small fuel economy advantage over the tyre's life, and it also scores better on noise (82.9 vs 77.8) — real owners confirm quieter operation on the Blizzak in general. Ride comfort is broadly similar between the two. Where the TS 860 recovers meaningful ground is tread life: its mileage score of 77 versus the Blizzak's 63.5 is a significant gap, and real-world evidence reinforces the concern — one TS 860 owner reported 4mm of tread loss in 6,000km and judged it unlikely to last a third winter, while the Blizzak's predicted durability is rated even lower by testers. Neither tyre is a mileage champion, but the Continental will last noticeably longer.

разходи
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
91%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Vredestein Wintrac
97%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
88%
разход на гориво
Vredestein Wintrac
96%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
96%
пробег
Vredestein Wintrac
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
87%
тегло на гумата
Vredestein Wintrac
94%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
96%
цена/стойност
Vredestein Wintrac
91%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86%

графика на представянето (паяк)

заключение

Across seven mutual tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 wins five — a convincing record driven by its dominant wet braking and all-round wet-road confidence. For drivers in urban or coastal climates where cold rain is more common than snow, it is the stronger and safer choice, and its vast size range (R14–R22, 156 dimensions) makes it accessible across virtually all passenger cars and SUVs. The Continental WinterContact TS 860 is the right tyre when snow is a regular reality: its snow performance is in a different class, tread life is meaningfully better, and it carries a remarkable owner satisfaction rating of 95/100 across 67 independent reviews. Choose the Blizzak for wet, mild winters; choose the TS 860 if your roads turn white.

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

размер Vredestein Wintrac Vredestein Wintrac Pro %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.