Blizzak dominates wet tarmac; WinterContact TS 860 takes over when snow arrives.
Both Continental and Bridgestone bring premium pedigree to this pairing, and both tyres have accumulated an unusually large body of independent test data. Their characters, however, diverge clearly: the WinterContact TS 860 is a balanced all-conditions winter tyre with exceptional snow credentials, while the Blizzak LM-005 is an unapologetic wet specialist — arguably the finest cold wet-tarmac performer of its generation. Both have since been updated (the TS 870 and Blizzak 6 are their respective successors), but both originals remain widely fitted and thoroughly understood.


These tyres were not tested together. the comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 36 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac ProDry performance is close. In the one mutual test where dry braking was precisely measured, both tyres recorded identical stopping distances of 15.4m. Across a broader range of evaluations, the TS 860 scores marginally higher overall, but the Blizzak has earned genuine praise for precise, neutral dry handling — its objective dry handling scores rank among the highest in its test group. The Blizzak's consistent weakness on dry roads is braking: testers across multiple years flag extended dry stops as its most notable deficit relative to class leaders, while the TS 860 is more composed here. Neither challenges the very best dry-focused winter tyres, but the Continental is the safer choice on dry tarmac.
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac ProThis is where the Blizzak LM-005 defines itself. Averaged across two shared wet braking measurements, it stops in 22.8m versus the TS 860's 24.0m — a 1.2m gap that holds consistently across different sizes. In the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 head-to-head, the difference widened to 2.3m (29.2m vs 31.5m), with the Blizzak finishing first in a 53-tyre field. Bridgestone achieved the maximum score in 80-0 km/h wet stopping in ADAC testing, and multiple organisations have since ranked it best-in-class for wet braking. The TS 860 is far from weak — its wet handling and wet circle cornering scores are class-leading — but the Blizzak's wet braking score of 94.6 represents a genuine step beyond. On aquaplaning resistance, the TS 860 edges ahead (87.6 vs 84.9).
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac ProSnow is the TS 860's strongest suit and the Blizzak's most significant limitation. The gap between their snow performance scores (90.5 vs 77.6) is the largest single difference in this comparison and is backed by consistent test evidence: the TS 860's snow circle cornering and measured snow handling are class-level, praised across multiple test campaigns. The Blizzak, by contrast, repeatedly draws criticism for understeer and weak lateral grip on snow, with ADAC explicitly flagging it as below par on winter roads. In the Autobild 2019 head-to-head, snow braking was nearly identical (24.5m vs 24.6m), but handling and traction on packed snow tell the real story. For drivers who regularly face snow-covered roads, this difference should be treated as decisive.
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac ProRolling resistance favours the Blizzak (86.6 vs 81.7), giving it a small fuel economy advantage over the tyre's life, and it also scores better on noise (82.9 vs 77.8) — real owners confirm quieter operation on the Blizzak in general. Ride comfort is broadly similar between the two. Where the TS 860 recovers meaningful ground is tread life: its mileage score of 77 versus the Blizzak's 63.5 is a significant gap, and real-world evidence reinforces the concern — one TS 860 owner reported 4mm of tread loss in 6,000km and judged it unlikely to last a third winter, while the Blizzak's predicted durability is rated even lower by testers. Neither tyre is a mileage champion, but the Continental will last noticeably longer.
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Vredestein Wintrac
Vredestein Wintrac ProAcross seven mutual tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 wins five — a convincing record driven by its dominant wet braking and all-round wet-road confidence. For drivers in urban or coastal climates where cold rain is more common than snow, it is the stronger and safer choice, and its vast size range (R14–R22, 156 dimensions) makes it accessible across virtually all passenger cars and SUVs. The Continental WinterContact TS 860 is the right tyre when snow is a regular reality: its snow performance is in a different class, tread life is meaningfully better, and it carries a remarkable owner satisfaction rating of 95/100 across 67 independent reviews. Choose the Blizzak for wet, mild winters; choose the TS 860 if your roads turn white.
сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.
| размер | Vredestein Wintrac | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Vredestein Wintrac vs Viking WinTech
Vredestein Wintrac vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
Vredestein Wintrac vs Nexen N blue HD Plus
Vredestein Wintrac vs Linglong ComfortMaster
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Michelin Alpin 6