сравнение: Vredestein Ultrac+ срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE320 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

висш среден клас

Vredestein

Ultrac+

VS

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Ultrac+

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk 2

ZIEX ZE320

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

1

26

3

6

5

10

3

Best position

#12

#1

#2

#3

#2

Average position

12.0

2.2

3.3

4.7

6.4

6.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2026

налични размери

28

66

40

146

43

104

60

40

мокър

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

мокро сцепление

Vredestein Ultrac+

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

сух

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Сухо представяне

Vredestein Ultrac+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

35%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Ultrac+

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk 2

ZIEX ZE320

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокър

сух

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението