сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test profile

FourTech Plus

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Брой тестове

5

14

3

1

Best position

#9

#2

#8

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

6.3

13.4

3.7

1.0

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

24

532

153

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

мокра обработка

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

аквапланинг - кръст

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

спиране на мокра настилка

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сняг

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

разходи

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

пробег

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

цена/стойност

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

външен шум

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

сух

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сухо спиране

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

обработка в сухо състояние

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

FourTech Plus

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението