сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test profile

FourTech Plus

Ventus Evo

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Брой тестове

5

6

3

10

Best position

#9

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

2.8

4.7

3.7

2.1

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

24

139

146

36

195

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

аквапланинг - кръст

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

спиране на мокра настилка

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

мокра обработка

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

сняг

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

разходи

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

пробег

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

сух

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

обработка в сухо състояние

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

сухо спиране

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

външен шум

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

FourTech Plus

Ventus Evo

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението