3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Брой тестове
5
1
18
10
4
6
Best position
#9
#1
#1
#2
#3
#3
Average position
12.0
1.0
6.1
6.0
12.0
4.7
най-нов тест
2025
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
налични размери
24
27
47
109
111
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store