3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
5
1
18
3
6
1
Best position
#9
#1
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
12.0
1.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
налични размери
24
27
47
36
146
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
цена/стойност
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store