3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Брой тестове
5
4
10
6
1
3
Best position
#9
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
3.3
6.0
4.7
1.0
3.7
най-нов тест
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
24
40
109
146
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store