3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Continental SportContact 7

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Брой тестове
5
18
1
4
3
16
Best position
#9
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
1.2
най-нов тест
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
налични размери
24
47
66
40
36
124

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store