сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Continental SportContact 7 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

FourTech Plus

Roadhawk 2

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Брой тестове

5

6

16

5

Best position

#9

#3

#1

Average position

12.0

4.7

1.2

2.8

най-нов тест

2025

2026

налични размери

24

146

124

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

аквапланинг - кръст

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

спиране на мокра настилка

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Continental SportContact 7

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

мокра обработка

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

сняг

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

разходи

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Continental SportContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental SportContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

пробег

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

външен шум

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

комфорт

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Continental SportContact 7

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

сух

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

сухо спиране

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Continental SportContact 7

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

обработка в сухо състояние

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Continental SportContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental SportContact 7 vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Continental SportContact 7 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

FourTech Plus

Roadhawk 2

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението