3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
5
3
3
6
4
1
Best position
#9
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
3.7
1.3
4.7
3.3
1.0
най-нов тест
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
налични размери
24
36
23
146
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store