3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Viking FourTech Plus срещу. Continental UltraContact срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Брой тестове
5
1
4
6
1
3
Best position
#9
#7
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
7.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
3.7
най-нов тест
2025
2023
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
24
87
40
146
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
спиране на мокра настилка
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
аквапланинг - кръст
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
мокра обработка
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
сняг
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
разходи
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
пробег
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
външен шум
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
комфорт
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
сух
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
сухо спиране
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
обработка в сухо състояние
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store