сравнение: Toyo Celsius срещу. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

висш среден клас

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

висш среден клас

Kleber

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Celsius

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Брой тестове

7

11

18

3

1

Best position

#7

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.9

11.6

6.1

3.7

1.0

най-нов тест

2022

2024

2025

налични размери

75

122

47

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

мокра обработка

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

спиране на мокра настилка

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

аквапланинг - кръст

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

водач от мократа страна

Toyo Celsius

60%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сух

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сухо спиране

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

обработка в сухо състояние

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

комфорт

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

външен шум

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

комфорт

Toyo Celsius

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

разходи

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Toyo Celsius срещу. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Celsius

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението