сравнение: Sava Intensa UHP 2 срещу. Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Sava

Intensa UHP 2

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Intensa UHP 2

ION FlexClimate

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

16

1

3

4

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

13.7

1.0

1.3

3.3

най-нов тест

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

76

27

23

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Sava Intensa UHP 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

мокра обработка

Sava Intensa UHP 2

64%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

аквапланинг - кръст

Sava Intensa UHP 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

спиране на мокра настилка

Sava Intensa UHP 2

65%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

сух

Sava Intensa UHP 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

сухо спиране

Sava Intensa UHP 2

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

комфорт

Sava Intensa UHP 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

външен шум

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

комфорт

Sava Intensa UHP 2

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

разходи

Sava Intensa UHP 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

пробег

Sava Intensa UHP 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Sava Intensa UHP 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Fulda SportControl 2

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Linglong Sport Master

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Debica Presto UHP 2

Continental UltraContact NXT vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental UltraContact NXT vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Continental UltraContact NXT vs Michelin Primacy 5

Continental UltraContact NXT vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Разгледай по марка

сравнение: Sava Intensa UHP 2 срещу. Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Intensa UHP 2

ION FlexClimate

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението