сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Bridgestone Turanza 6 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza 6

PremiumContact 7

Брой тестове

14

3

13

26

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

3.3

6.2

2.2

най-нов тест

2023

2026

налични размери

47

40

225

66

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

мокро сцепление

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

45%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Сухо представяне

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

35%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

51%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

54%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Bridgestone Turanza 6 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza 6

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението