3 магазини · 0+ продукти
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Linglong ComfortMaster срещу. Kleber Dynaxer UHP срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Linglong ComfortMasterBudget
LinglongLinglong

ComfortMaster

R13 – R17
Kleber Dynaxer UHPвисш среден клас
KleberKleber

Dynaxer UHP

3.8
R17 – R20
Falken e.Ziexвисш среден клас
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Linglong
ComfortMaster
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
1
6
3
1
Best position
#8
#13
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
16.0
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2024
2023
2025
2025
налични размери
94
44
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокра обработка
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
комфорт
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
сух
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
разходи
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best tyres for evsНай-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Популярни сравнения на гуми

VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Сравнете също

Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs Viking Protech NewGenKleber Dynaxer UHP vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKleber Dynaxer UHP vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Разгледай по марка

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store