3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52висш среден клас
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.Ziexвисш среден клас
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
10
3
26
3
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
2.2
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
104
40
66
34
64

мокър

мокър
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокра обработка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

комфорт

комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

сух

сух
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

разходи

разходи
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
цена/стойност
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение