сравнение: Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

висш среден клас

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

ION FlexClimate

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Брой тестове

1

4

3

26

5

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

12.0

3.3

2.2

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

27

111

40

60

66

63

мокър

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

аквапланинг - кръст

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

спиране на мокра настилка

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

мокра обработка

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

сняг

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

комфорт

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

външен шум

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

комфорт

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

сух

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

сухо спиране

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

разходи

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Hankook ION FlexClimate срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION FlexClimate

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

мокър

сняг

комфорт

сух

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението