3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Firestone Roadhawkвисш среден клас
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Premium
PirelliPirelli

P ZERO PZ4

9.1
R13 – R23
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Брой тестове
21
3
14
26
5
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
5.5
2.2
2.2
най-нов тест
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
налични размери
164
40
706
66
63

мокър

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

сух

сух
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
реакция на сухо управление
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

комфорт

комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
вътрешен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

разходи

разходи
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение