3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 6 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
21
18
36
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
6.1
3.1
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2024
2024
2023
2025
2025
налични размери
165
47
303
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
водач от мократа страна
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
сух
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
реакция на сухо управление
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
вътрешен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
разходи
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
горивна ефективност
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store