3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. Continental PremiumContact 6 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
21
36
4
1
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.1
3.3
1.0
най-нов тест
2024
2023
2026
2025
налични размери
165
303
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
водач от мократа страна
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
представяне на мокро
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
сух
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
представяне на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
реакция на сухо управление
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
вътрешен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
разходи
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
горивна ефективност
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store